Skip to content

Search our website

Pages

Articles

Bearing Failure

Journal Bearing Failures

Journal bearings do not have rolling elements, rather a thin layer of oil separates the rotating bore from the babbitt. This is a promising technology that can improve gearbox reliability and reduce costs. Journal bearings can operate nearly indefinitely if the oil film can be maintained. The risk is that rapid wear can occur if the lubrication film is inadequate.

Also referred to as:
Plain Bearings, Fluid Film Bearings, Babbitts, Bushings

Hero image 1

Introduction to journal bearing failures

Journal bearings in wind turbine gearboxes are relatively new but are becoming standard equipment on most 3+MW turbines shipping today. The journals are usually in the planet gears to keep the diameter of the ring gears minimalised.

This reduces weight, increases torque density, reduces transportation width, and reduces the number of moving components within the gearbox. For wind gearboxes the journals are hydrodynamic using a typical low pressure lubrication system. Therefore, the bearing must begin to rotate to develop the oil film separation.

Given there is no rolling contact fatigue, a journal bearing can have an infinite design life. But if the lubrication film is disrupted wear will occur either gradually or suddenly, with excessive heat generation. New analytics, sensors, and inspection methods are needed for journal gearbox monitoring to reach the high standards expected for predictive maintenance in the wind industry.

What causes journal bearing failures?

Premature failure of journal bearing gearboxes in wind turbines is mostly related to a loss of lubrication. If the gearbox is only experiencing low speeds and low torques during insufficient lubrication, then the journal bearing design is probably robust enough to resist damage for an occasional short-duration event.

Most of the journal bearing failures that the industry is aware of have occurred shortly after commissioning and could have been avoided. Otherwise, most of the journal gearboxes have been operating without issues in the field for 3+ years.

Journal Bearings 7
Journal Bearings 4

Potential failure causes & operational scenarios of concern for journal bearings:

  • Single blade installation with a high torque turning gear can cause galling wear if the oil film is not sufficient.
  • Pinwheeling without electrical grid connection to power the lubrication pump.
  • Sump oil level too low for the passive oil scoops on the planet pins to gravity-feed oil to the journals when turbine pinwheeling.
  • Cold startup with highly viscous oil.
  • Lubrication pump or piping system malfunction.
  • Lubrication passageways within the gearbox become blocked (e.g., foreign objects, rotary hydraulic joint issues, nozzles clogged).
  • Journal babbitt spins on pin (assembly error, locking feature failure) resulting in a blocked oil supply port.
  • Lubricant contaminant (e.g., secondary damage from debris generated by a failing component elsewhere in the gearbox, oil pump failure, filter bypass).
  • Gearbox assembly (e.g., metal shavings in passages, gouging from misalignment during assembly).
  • Excessive misalignment wear related to gearbox design.

Most of these failure causes are avoidable, but when a journal does fail, it is often sudden and without warning.

Suspect journal bearing failures?

Speak to an expert

Appearance

Photo 1: The journal bearings are not visible in the typical inspection location for planet bearings and the gap that leads down to the thrust journal is too small for a 4mm borescope tip.

Photo 2: Catastrophic failure of a journal gearbox can be confirmed by borescope Look for overheated metal on the carrier casting.

Photo 3: Some journal gearboxes have an oil supply passageway that provides borescope access to the middle of the journal. The upwind side of the planet pins have a hollow center that scoops oil from the sump to gravity feed the journals during grid outages; a fail-safe design feature. Once the borescope is at the passive port look for fine copper debris or wear markings on the planet gear bore.

Borescope inspection
Picture 2

How journal bearing failures progress

If the oil layer cannot prevent metal to metal contact, then abrasive wear can occur. In most cases the gear oil additives, babbitt materials, and gearbox design can prevent this direct contact from causing damage. Abrasive wear can continue to progress if the lubrication film can’t develop properly in areas of surface damage.   

In the images shown, abrasive wear has removed a thin coating and exposed the babbitt’s copper alloy.


Journal bearing failure modes are well understood from their use in automotive engines and industrial machinery for over a century. The wind industry can leverage this existing knowledge base, such as the paper below discussing journal failure nomenclature, appearance, severity rating, and progression.  

https://www.ripublication.com/ijaer10/ijaerv10n16_121.pdf 

“Muzakkir, S.M., Lijesh, K.P., Hirani, H., Failure Mode and Effect Analysis of Journal Bearing (2015) International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, Volume 10 (Number 16), pp. 36843-36850.” 

How to detect journal bearing failures

Method
Detection Efficiency
Notes
Borescope inspection
Hard
Borescopes can not access the very small gap between the journal surfaces; there is no view available of the load bearing surfaces. Indications of overheating, from a severe failure, may be visible on the adjacent carrier or planet pin.
SCADA
Hard
The oil temperature of the drain lines or gearbox sump can be used to detect a catastrophic journal failure using SCADA data. However, the detection lead time is likely to be very short as by the time of detectable temperature rise, the bearing damage is likely to be very progressed. Typically there are no additional sensors fitted to journal bearing gearboxes to specially monitor the journals. In other industries proximity sensors mounted internally monitor the oil film thickness and/or temperature sensors at the babbitt surface.
Vibration analysis
Hard
Traditional vibration analysis can not detect fault frequencies in journal bearings because unlike rolling element bearings there are no repetitive impacts from a roller or raceway defect. Wind turbine planetary stage journals operate at low speed, therefore oil film instability vibration faults like whirl and whip do not occur. The industry is working to develop vibration monitoring methods for journal bearings; progress is expected as field failures produce data for retrospective vibration analysis. There are differences seen in the planetary mesh frequencies and harmonics of journal gearboxes because the oil film stiffness supporting the planet gear is higher than the equivalent rolling element bearing. This metric is an example of how a degrading journal babbitt could reveal a fault trend in vibration data.
Oil debris monitoring
Medium
Journal bearings consist of a babbitt material typically made of copper or aluminium. This softer non-ferrous metal will wear against the adjacent steel surface if the oil film separation is compromised. The appropriate oil debris monitoring (ODM) sensor for detecting nonferrous particles is an inductive coil particle counter (eg. Gastops, Poseidon, Hydac, etc). A particle counter can continuously monitor for journal bearing wear shedding debris. The shortcoming of particle counters currently on the market is that only large nonferrous particles (300um to larger) can be sensed by the inductive coil. Nonferrous particle readings under 100um may be needed to detect early indications.

Explore ONYX oil condition monitoring

Learn More

Discussion

For the wind turbine owners and operators the keys areas for journal bearing reliability are:

  • Construction: Be aware if the gearboxes are equipped with journal bearings. The installation documentation may include procedures specific to journal gearboxes, such as: single blade install, transportation & storage, pre-commissioning idle states for the lubrication system, and startup checklists. Be sure to activate the vibration and particle counter CMS monitoring before power production begins; failures have occurred in the initial weeks of operation when the CMS data was not being monitored yet.
  • Condition monitoring: inquire with the turbine OEM if there are CMS options specifically for journal bearing gearboxes. There should be an oil debris monitoring option using inductive coil particle counters. There should also be analytical CMS rules for detecting journal bearing and lubrication issues using vibration and SCADA.
  • Operations: Ensuring proper function of the lubrication system and maintaining gear oil health is important. Previously routine faults on oil temperature, pressure, and filters are now risky to remotely reset without an uptower inspection. Low oil level can cause journals to fail suddenly; ensure level sensors are calibrated periodically and communicating correctly with the controller. The lubrication film thickness in a journal bearing’s load zone can be less than 10 microns therefore proper oil filtration is critical to prevent wear; consider installing an offline filter system. During grid outage events there will be no oil pumping to the planets; have technicians trained on procedures to prevent damage to journals (e.g. dry sump vs. wet sump mode, pinwheeling rotor vs. locked for a short period, shutdown and restart checklists, troubleshooting training). Standard practices for blade replacement, high speed stage gearbox repairs, and cold weather startup may risk damaging journal bearings. Sudden gearbox failures could result in lost production and complicated crane work due to a seized gearbox.

As the journal gearbox fleet ages, we will discover what methods are needed for any reliability shortcomings, but remember that the turbine system is designed to operate appropriately for journal bearing gearboxes. Risky scenarios for the journals have been mitigated with design, controls, or fault protocols. Many turbine platforms are fitted interchangeably with rolling element bearing and journal gearboxes with no operational differences needed. The turbine OEMs have done years of design and testing in collaboration with established journal bearing manufacturers and veteran wind gearbox OEMs.

For decades planet bearing failures have been costly to the wind industry and the limiting component on gearbox life. Journal bearing technology provides a win-win solution across multiple aspects of wind energy generation.

Drive performance and reliability with drivetrain and oil condition monitoring

Learn More

Severity rating

Rank 1 Polishing wear: Mild polishing wear of the journal babbitt is expected and acceptable. Minor wear should not hinder the ability of the oil film layer to properly develop and support the planet gear loading.
Polishing wear 8
Detection:

Detection of small fine wear particles is unlikely; even with oil debris monitoring or oil sample lab analysis.

Recommended action:

No action needed. Maintain the proper function of the gearbox lubrication and filtration system.

Rank 2 Standstill fretting: When a gearbox sits stationary for a prolonged period (eg. rotor locked multiple days) the lubricant can be pushed out of the metal-to-metal contact areas; even if the oil pump is running. Wear can develop in discrete locations on the soft babbitt or steel bore from micro-motion and the loss of oil film.
Standstill fretting
Detection:

Detection of standstill fretting is unlikely. If severe, then vibration may detect periodic impacts from lubrication disruptions and changes in behaviour of the planetary mesh.

Recommended action:

With journal bearing gearboxes be more diligent in following the turbine OEM’s recommendations when locking the rotor or sitting idle.

Rank 3 Wear out: In industrial machinery some journal bearings are designed for routine inspections. This creates an understanding of wear progression and what is acceptable wear without functional issues.
Wear out
Detection:

End of life wear out scenario: as the turbine approaches the end of it’s useful life, presumably the CMS sensors will have trended the slow progression of abrasive wear spreading throughout the journal’s load zones.

Recommended action:

Journal bearings can still operate even when wear has occurred. The bearing loads are distributed across a large surface area, even with some of that surface compromised the fluid film bearing can still properly support the planet gear.

Rank 4 Lubrication failure: Sudden loss of lubrication supply to journal bearings results in two compounding issues. Lack of fresh cool oil to dissipate the heat generated. Loss of oil film separation causes the metal surfaces to contact as extreme pressure, if the turbine is in power production mode.
Lubrication failure
Detection:

Severe failure of one or multiple journals occurring over a matter of minutes will likely fault the turbine based on high oil temperature, clogged filter, or swarf sensor alarms; ideally before there is excessive heat damage.

Recommended action:

Gearbox will need to be replaced. Failed lubrication has likely caused a variety of failure modes: spinning sleeve; sleeve fracture. thermal crack networks Overheating, scoring/galling

Severity rating continued

Rank 1
Rank 2 Abrasive wear: Abrasive wear could be caused by either oil contaminates larger than the film thickness or by metal to metal contact.
Abrasive wear 10
Detection:

Acute issue: Severe abrasive wear may produce large enough non-ferrous particle to be detected by an inductive coil particle counter.

Recommended action:

If an early in life acute issue, inspect the lubrication system for any potential cause of inadequate lubrication supply to journals. Borescope to confirm that this isn’t the onset of severe failure.

Rank 3 Brief damage: A lubrication issue, loading event, or maintenance action creates a minor amount of altercation to the journal babbitt or bore for an isolated moment.
Journal assembly generic
Detection:

Ideally a variety of condition monitoring sensors can quickly detect the onset of journal damage and shut down the turbine before excessive damage occurs.

Recommended action:

Gearbox can be returned to service after some verifications are made that the undesirable condition no longer exists.

Rank 4 Gearbox seizure: Overheating causes bearing surfaces to melt and weld together resulting in gearbox seizure.
Gearbox seizure
Detection:

Controller fault. SCADA: gearbox oil sump temperature.

Recommended action:

Crane replacement of the drivetrain may be complicated by a seized gearbox if the rotor is not oriented correctly for lifting.

Want to speak to a bearings subject matter expert?

Book free 1-1